Solutions

Retire at 62 vs. 67: What Is the Difference?

Choosing between retiring at 62 and retiring at 67 involves tradeoffs that go well beyond simply having five more years of savings.

Moore Invested

Deciding whether to retire at 62 vs. 67 involves tradeoffs that go well beyond five more years of savings.

Retiring at 62 gives you more years of freedom. But it also creates a longer retirement to fund. You would go three years without Medicare coverage. And if you claim Social Security early, your benefit is permanently reduced.

Retiring at 67 aligns with your Full Retirement Age for Social Security. That means you receive your full earned benefit. Medicare is already in place. You have also had five more years to build savings. And your portfolio needs to last for a shorter time.

The financial impact is substantial. Say you have a $1 million portfolio at 62. If you delay retirement to 67 and keep contributing, you could accumulate significantly more. You would also lock in a higher Social Security benefit for life.

That said, health, career satisfaction, caregiving responsibilities, and personal priorities all factor into this decision.

At Moore Invested, we help clients model both scenarios in detail. That way, the decision is based on real numbers rather than assumptions. It gives you confidence in whichever path you choose.